Free and Open Elections

The universal use of elections as a tool for selecting representatives in modern democracies is in contrast with the practice in the democratic example. As the Elections were considered an oligarchic institution where political offices were filled using elections and voting.
America is not a Democracy. We have ballot access and political party restrictions in almost every state.
This right for Alternative Parties is hampered today by voters who seek alternative political choices, both independent candidates and alternative political parties have not right to ballot access. Monopoly of the political process by the two major parties (One party with two wings) has, in fact, denied the voters an effective freedom of political choice. In America we have two candidates who are designated winners.
In France there are 13 political parties vying for office. The primary for parties is one year before the first round. In the first round the primary winner for all political parties are voted for. The second round consists of the top three winners. The third round three candidates are voted for, the top vote grabber wins.
If the two top candidates are close, the third candidate is eliminated and there is a third round called instant run off.
Electoral systems are the detailed constitutional arrangements and voting systems that convert the vote into political decision. In the United States voting laws are made by the States, and in many there is voting and candidate restrictions for non Democrats and Republicans
While openness and accountability are usually considered cornerstones of a democratic system, the act of casting a vote and the content of a voter’s ballot. The secret ballot is a relatively modern development, but it is now considered crucial in most free and fair elections, as it limits the effectiveness of intimidation.
Many political parties around the world have coalition voting. A coalition government is a cabinet of a parliamentary government in which several political parties cooperate. The usual reason given for this arrangement is that no party on its own can achieve a majority in the parliament.
In which case a President can depend on Alternative Political parties to move his agenda. The Blue dog Democrats and Republicans can vote against a Presidents policy, while Liberal, Left Democrats, American Labor Party, and Greens can support a notion and pass it. Also, Like the Canadian Co-operative Common Wealth Party of Canada (Today Canada’s number two party: The New Democrats), who in 1966 brought in National Health Care. A minority alternative party had the power to install that system.
Powerful parties can also act in hurting democracy. They stifle the growth of emerging parties and political initiatives. Of course, such an event is rare in coalition governments when compared to two-party systems, which typically exists because of stifling the growth of emerging parties, often through discrimination . People lose freedom of choice, and the liberty to choose and have divergent points of view and free choices are taken away.
In Finland, no party has had an absolute majority in the parliament since independence, and multi-party coalitions have been the norm. Finland experienced its most stable government since

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s